Skip to content 
Lactose as a Diluent: Impact of Different Grades on Tablet Compressibility and Formability
Lactose is one of the most widely used diluents (fillers) in oral solid dosage formulations, particularly in direct compression (DC) and wet granulation tablet production. Its physicochemical properties—including particle size, flowability, and compactibility—vary significantly among different grades, such as spray-dried lactose, anhydrous lactose, and milled lactose. Choosing the appropriate grade is critical for ensuring tablet formability, mechanical strength, and process robustness.
This article explores the impact of different lactose types on tablet compressibility, discusses formulation considerations, and offers insight into optimal excipient selection strategies.
1. Common Types of Lactose Used in Tableting
| Type | Key Features | Typical Applications |
|---|---|---|
| α-Lactose Monohydrate (Milled) | Good binding, poor flow | Wet granulation |
| Spray-Dried Lactose | Excellent flow, moderate binding | Direct compression |
| Anhydrous Lactose (Roller Compacted or Spray-Dried) | High compressibility, good flow | DC and high-speed compression |
| Granulated Lactose | Flowable, pre-blended | Capsules and DC blends |
Each type differs in particle morphology, moisture content, and compaction behavior, which influence tablet characteristics.
2. Impact on Tablet Compressibility and Mechanical Strength
a. Milled Lactose (Monohydrate)
Offers good binding but poor flowability
Requires granulation to ensure uniformity
Compressibility is moderate; tablets may exhibit capping if not granulated properly
b. Spray-Dried Lactose (SDL)
Spherical morphology provides superior flow
Moderate compressibility—suitable for direct compression
Tablets have good surface finish and low friability
c. Anhydrous Lactose
Excellent compressibility due to plastic deformation properties
Preferred in high-speed tableting where mechanical strength is critical
Higher sensitivity to lubricant (e.g., magnesium stearate) may reduce bonding if not optimized
3. Formulation Considerations
When selecting a lactose grade, formulators must balance several key factors:
API Properties: Poorly compressible APIs may benefit from anhydrous lactose
Manufacturing Process: DC requires better flowability (e.g., SDL), while wet granulation allows use of milled lactose
Tablet Specifications: Hardness, disintegration time, and friability targets affect excipient selection
Lubricant Sensitivity: Anhydrous lactose may exhibit reduced tablet strength at higher lubricant levels
It is often beneficial to perform preformulation studies comparing compressibility curves (e.g., Heckel plots) and tabletability profiles under different compression forces.
4. Case Example: Formulation Impact
In a comparative trial using 200 mg tablets with a poorly compactable API:
Tablets using milled lactose via wet granulation achieved adequate hardness but had batch variability
Spray-dried lactose allowed direct compression, but required binder addition for friability control
Anhydrous lactose gave the highest hardness and best uniformity, but only after optimizing lubricant and compression speed
5. Conclusion
Lactose is a versatile and well-characterized excipient, but its performance in tablets is highly grade-dependent. Understanding the distinct compaction and flow behaviors of each lactose type is essential for robust formulation development and efficient production.
Selecting the appropriate lactose grade—guided by API characteristics, process requirements, and desired tablet attributes—can significantly improve tablet quality, yield, and manufacturability.
